Saturday, December 24, 2005

Of Mind, Body, and Spirit
Downward spirals come in many different shapes of whirlpools, and some are far easier to swim out of than others. Take the past month or month and a half in my life for example; I have been straight up miserable.

This past week I've been focusing on getting myself back together, and after working out, reading, and going out numerous times I now feel so much incredibly better! It's amazing how interconnected the mind, body, and spirit are. I mean, if I work out and treat my body well physically, mentally I feel much better. If I couple that with reading and thinking then I'll feel even better yet physically, and so on...

Much of my misery comes from my ex girlfriend. She is going through a rather rough time at the moment, and it really brings me down to see her like this, especially when I know that there's nothing more I can do for her. She basically shut me out and won't talk to me about anything... She broke up with me essentially because she can't handle a committed relationship. I'm really worried about her. The only time I've really gotten to talk to her since we broke up is in several minute intervals where she's unbelievably smashed. That and she has been sleeping A LOT and simply refuses to go to a doctor.

What's a boy to do...

Wednesday, December 07, 2005

MERI AAPNI SUNTE RAHIYE ,
AAP BHI AAPNI KAHTA RAHIYE ,,
WAKT GUJAR JAYEGA YU HI ,
SATH MERE BAS CHALTE RAHIYE ,,
GAM NE KISKO BAKSA HAI ,
HASTE-HASTE MILTE RAHIYE ,,
KOI TO GAM BAAT HI LEGA ,,
ES UMMID PE JITE RAHIYE ,,

Friday, December 02, 2005

I Give to you
A fire to light inside your heart,
to feel the warm embers glow.
A piece of the sun's warm rays,
to bask in it's fiery show.

I Give to you
A piece of a rainbow to color your world,
when all seems totally gray.
Some roses for the sweet perfume,
to kiss your senses with its bouquet.



I Give to you
A sprinkling of some twinkling stars,
to wish upon at night.
The morning dew to kiss the day,
To bask in it's delight.


I Give to you
A summer's breeze to caress your face,
to show that someone cares.
The sweet song of the nightingale,
to remind you that I am always there.


I Give to you
My lasting friendship, always true.
A gift of love to hold inside,
whenever you feel blue,
or just because you need a friend.
This friend....that will always be there for you!!

Author Unknown

Sunday, November 27, 2005

Creamy fence to wild grass makes sense!

Cup of Ice Cream melting into a stream!

An intricate microbe put under a strobe;

Greener the trouble, likely always there to double;

Zest to test,

Care even the corn even if u are torn!

That is what I intend to do!!!

*********************************
* If there is breath, *
* If there is beat, *
* If there is sense, *
* If there is reflex, *
* *
* THERE SHOULD BE A HUMAN! *
*********************************


Don't help if you can't; Just don't HURT, even if you can!

Friday, November 25, 2005

EK LARKI THI DEEWANI SI..
net use kya karti thi
chori chori chopkay chopkay Email likha karti thi
messenger use kar na tha os ko
password hack honay say darti thi
jab bhi milti mujsay.
mujse poocha karti thi yeh password hack kese hota hai
yeh password kese hota hai.
aur main yeh hi kah pata tha.
messenger khula ho ya band
password tu hack hota hai
kese kahon main oo yaraa yeh password kese hack hota hai..
ajj hi yaroo kisi ko hack kar kay dekhen gay hum
hacking hoti hai kese kar kay dekhen gay hum
kis kay messenger main add huway buddies ko hum nay churaliye
kisi kay inbox ki email hum nay oradi
ae yaar net pay koi kisi ka na hota hai
kese kahoon main oo yaraa yeh password kese hack hota hai
kya yeh hai chatting ka jaduu jab koi sign in hota hai
block kar kay sub females kay peechay hota hai
door kaheen computer par banay ladkiyan
kun janay koi hacker kab kese kahan milay
jo asl chat pay hoo likha woo aksar hi jhot hota hai
kese kahoon main oo yara yeh password kese hack hota hai
शाम

पहले,
जब शाम आती थी,
तो सूरज ऊंघता था,
अपने नीले बिछौने में.
और ढक लेता था,
अपना चेहरा
उस लाल चादर में.
और दूसरे छोर पे
चांद मुस्कुराया करता था,
उसकी बेचारगी पे.

बैठती थी शाम,
मेरे बगल कि,
उस खाली कुर्सी पे
मुस्कुराता हुआ
चेहरा,
शाम का,
रोकता था हर पल को,
कि हो ना जाये
रात,
देखते ही देखते
गुज़र जाया करता था,
जाने कितना ही वक्त,
शाम के साथ.


इक उम्र गुज़र गई,
और कुछ भी तो नहीं बदला.
अब भी
सूरज वही लाल चादर ओढे,
चेहरा ढक लेता है
और चांद,
अब भी,
वैसे ही मुस्कुराता है,
अगर कुछ बदल गया है,
तो सिर्फ़ इतना
कि
अब शाम नहीं आती
हां ................
वो शाम.......................
वो शाम याद बहुत आती है

Thursday, November 24, 2005

I am nothing special;of this I am sure. I am a common man with common thoughts and I've led a common life. There are no monuments dedicated to me and my name will soon be forgotten, but i've loved another with all my heart and soul, and to me, this has always been enough.

friendly,honest,shy,I try to remain happy and make others happy as much as possible ,i prefer listening than speaking, for further details meet me :)

हम क्यों कफन ओढ़ें जो जिंदा साँस हैं,
हम क्यों जहर पीयें कि जब तक आस है,
हौसला बुलंद है जब तक राह में हैं,
दिल में पुखता सा कोई विश्वास है...

I walk through a maze
A long winding road
Where there are many
Intersections and choices

I choose the Love Street
Here I give my heart
I give my attention
I give my all
And I am set free

I choose the Happy Street
Here I give my sadness
My doubts and my fears
I realize that there's
Not much I can do for tomorrow
But be happy for today

I choose the Praise Street
Where I thank my God
For the tears and the laughter
Because I know that
I go through it all
To make me stronger

If life is a choice
Then why do we choose
To hate than to love
To cry than to laugh
To see the clouds
Instead of the beautiful blue skies

When we have only one lifetime
Why do we choose to waste it
On memories of pain
Instead of embracing
The love and happiness
Just waiting to be found

I choose to love
I choose to give
I choose LIFE.......

A careless word may kindle strife; A cruel word may wreck a life; A timely word may level stress ... A loving word may heal and bless"
OU ARE
As innocent as a flower
As sweet as cherry pie
As beautiful as a sunset
As bright as a firefly
As clever as a musician
As romantic as a red rose
As genuine as a teardrop
As funny as a clown’s nose
As honest as a young child
As fun as a merry-go-round
As rare as a four leaf clover
As down-to-earth as the ground
As friendly as a butterfly
As precious as passing youth
As gorgeous as miss world is
As valuable as pure truth
?´¯`?´¯`?´¯`?´¯`?´¯`?´¯`?´¯`?¯`?
?´¯`?´¯`?´¯`?´¯`?´¯`?´¯`?´¯`?¯`?
whT cAn i saY aBt nEhA.. hE iSs tHE bEst!!!

Wednesday, November 23, 2005

Soft Ware Programming!

struct female_professionals
{
double styles;
short skirts;
long time_to_understand_problems;
float mind;
void knowledge;
char non_co-operative;
}
struct married_females
{
double weight;
short tempered;
long gossip;
float hopes;
void word;
char unstable;
}
struct engaged_females
{
double time_on_phone;
short attention_on_work;
long boast;
float on_cloud_nine;
void understanding;
char edgy;
}
struct newly_married_females
{
double dinner_invitation;
short time_at_work;
long lunch_break;
void bank_balance;
char hen_pecked;
}
struct husband_wife_professionals
{
double income;
short tempered;
long time_no_see_each_other;
void love_life;
char money_making;
}
struct beautiful_city_girl
{
double boyfriends;
short affairs;
long stories;
void greymatter;
char flirt;
}
struct old_lady
{
double chin ;
short memory;
long sighs ;
void attention_from_men;
char chatterbox;
}








james bond and telegu

On a flight James bond was sitting next to a Telugu
guy.

Telugu Guy: "Hello, May I know your name please?"

James Bond: "My name is Bond"

Continuing in his inimitable style, " .....James
Bond."

Then Bond asks: "And you?"

Telugu Guy: " My name is Rao...

Siva Rao...

Samba Siva Rao...

Venkata Samba Siva Rao...

Yarlagadda Venkata Samba Siva Rao...

Rajasekhara Yarlagadda Venkata Samba Siva Rao...

Sitaramanjaneyula Rajasekhara Yarlagadda Venkata Samba
Siva Rao...

Vijayawada Sitaramanjaneyula Rajasekhara Yarlagadda
Venkata Samba Siva
Rao..."

Since then when anyone asks Bond his name he simply
says "James Bond"

sach...








pag pag mei sunahre phool khile, kabhi na ho kanton se samna, jeevan apka khusiyo se bhar jaye yahi hai hamari kamna...


Khusboo ki tarah apke paas bikhar jayenge, sukoon bankar dil mei utar jayenge, jara mahsus to kijiye, dur hote huye bhi paas najar aayenge....



you may have someone in ur heart, you may have someone in ur dreams, you may have someone in ur life... don't u worry... there will always be me...

Monday, November 21, 2005

खुद पर नहीं अपना मालिकाना हक है
जताने चले जग में मालिकाना हक है

लोग कहते हैं ये मुल्क है तेरा अपना
बेघर तेरा बेहतरीन मालिकाना हक है

यहाँ खूब झगड़ लिए राम रहीम ईसा
वहाँ नहीं किसी का मालिकाना हक है

दिलों में दूरियाँ तब से और बढ़ गईँ
जब से प्रकट किया मालिकाना हक है

ले फिरे है अपनी रूह बाज़ारों में रवि
मोटे असामी का ही मालिकाना हक है
माफ़ी के काबिल नहीं हैं ये गलतियाँ
तब भी हो रहीं गलतियों पे गलतियाँ

मौज की दृश्यावली लगती तो है पर
पीढ़ियों को सहनी होगी ये गलतियाँ

जब भी पकड़ा गया फरमाया उसने
भूल से ही हो रहीं थीं ये गलतियाँ

अब तो दौर ये आया नया है यारो
सच का जामा पहने हैं ये गलतियाँ

कभी अपनी भी गिन लो रवि तुमने
दूसरों की तो खूब गिनी ये गलतियाँ

Friday, November 18, 2005

chahe Kar le zamana zitne bi sitam,
chahe Kar le zamana zitne bi sitam
Phir Bi na bichdenge
ey sanam hum. .......

मु:
(भूल गये क्यों देके सहारा
लूटने वाले चैन हमारा) - २

आओ के दिल मजबूर है ग़म से
रूठ गई तक़दीर भी हमसे
डूब गया क़िस्मत का तरा
भूल गये क्यों देके सहारा

श:
(टूट गया दिल दर्द का मारा
हाय ये किसने मुझको पुकारा) - २
आज हुआ क्या दिल को ना जाने
बैठे बिठाये दिल की सदा ने
ठेस लगाकर ग़म को उभारा
हाय ये किसने मुझको पुकारा

मु:
चारों तरफ़ तूफ़ान है भारी
दिल को लगी है आस तुम्हारी
नाव भँवर में दूर किनारा
भूल गये क्यों देके सहारा

श:
आके सताये दर्द-ए-जिगर ने
कोई बताअये किस की नज़र ने
छीन लिया दिल करके इशारा
हाय ये किसने मुझको पुकारा
मुझसे दूर कहाँ जाओगे उर्फ जिजिविषा

पाताल तो पाताल है
अन्तरिक्ष में भी मुझे पाओगे
मैं गुस्र्त्वआकर्षण के सिद्धांत के विपरीत भी
सिद्धांत हूँ ।
मुझसे दूर कहाँ जाओगे

मैं जितनी तरल हूँ
उतनी ही विरल हूँ
इतनी सरल हूँ
मुझसे दूर कहाँ जाओगे
पाताल तो पाताल है
अन्तरिक्ष में भी मुझे पाओगे
मुझसे दूर कहाँ जाओगे

विरल इतनी कि सांसों में बस जाऊंगी
तरल इतनी कि रक्त बन शिराओं में घूम आऊंगी
सरल इतनी कि गहरी नींद का चेहरा बन जाऊंगी
मुझसे दूर कहाँ जाओगे

रोज सुबह दरवाजे पर दस्तक देती हूँ
मैं उम्मीद हूँ , एक दिन और जीने की
दुलारूंगी तुझे,पुकारूंगी तुझे
कभी मैं दुम हिलाऊंगी, कभी तुम हिलाओगे
मुझसे दूर कहाँ जाओगे

तुम

भूल तो सकते हो मेरे दोस्त
कुछ समय के लिए
उन शाश्वत सत्यों को
और रख सकते हो
छलावे में अपने आप को
उन, मिथ्या और
क्षणिक सुखों की
चासनी में डुबोकर
जिनके सामने,
आगे-पीछे
या फिर
ऊपर और नीचे
तुम्हें कुछ दिखाई नहीं देता।
कोई दर्पण
जो तुम्हें
तुम्हारा
असली चेहरा
दिखाने की कोशिश करता है,
तुम्हारा अहं,
उसे चकनाचूर कर देता है।
तुम्हें याद भी न होगा
या कहूं कि
तुम्हें फुर्सत ही कहाँ है
जो ये जानो कि
अब तक कितने दर्पण,
तुम्हारी,
बेरहमी का शिकार हुए हैं।

ऐसा न हो कि
एक दिन
उनके टुकडे
बिखरते-बिखरते
इतने हो जायें कि
घर से बाहर निकले, तुम्हारे हर कदम को
लहू-लुहान कर दें।
तब,
और तब,
क्या होगा मेरे दोस्त,

जब गुजर जाएगा वह, जिसे,
आज तक,
न तुम रोक पाए हो
न मैं
और न कोई अन्य ही।
सच तो ये है कि
वह अकेला ही नहीं गुजरता
बल्कि अपने साथ
सब कुछ,
हाँ-हाँ ... स.....ब कुछ
बदलते हुए गुजरता है।
और तब,
बियावान जंगल में
भटक गए प्राणी-सा
एकाकी मन,
चीत्कार करता है,
छटपटाता है
हा-हाकार करता है।
पर,
इससे आगे,
कर कुछ नहीं सकता,
क्योंकि,
यही प्रकृति का नियम है।
इसलिए पुन: कहता हूँ कि
तुम,
भूल तो सकते हो मेरे दोस्त
कुछ समय के लिए,
उन शाश्वत सत्यों को
पर,
नकार नहीं सकते!
नकार नहीं सकते मेरे दोस्त,!!
नकार नहीं सकते!!!

हम सुधि-बुधि अपनी भूल गए ........

हम , सुधि-बुधि , अपनी , भूल गए,
जीवन में , इतने द्वंद्व रहे।

जड़ , चेतन से , हम दूर हुए ,
जग से , ऐसे सम्‍बन्‍ध कटे।

असहाय जिये , निरुपाय रहे,
अपमानों के , कितने दंश सहे।

कण-कण में , बसने वाले को,
तीरथ-तीरथ , पूजने चले।

आकाश असीमित था , लेकिन,
उड़ने पर , अपने , पंख जले ।

इस , सजी-धजी नगरी , में ,आ,
पतझड़ , वसन्‍त से, दूर भए।
जो मैं ऐसा जानती
के प्रीत किये दुख होय
ओ, नगर ढिंढोरा पीटती
के प्रीत न करियो कोय

मोहे भूल गए साँवरिया, भूल गए साँवरिया -२
आवन कह गये, अजहुं न आये -२
लीनी न मोरी खबरिया
मोहे भूल गए...

(दिल को दिए क्यों दुख बिरहा के
तोड़ दिया क्यों महल बना के) -२
आस दिला के ओ बेदर्दी -२
फेर ली काहे नजरिया
मोहे भूल गए...

(नैन कहे रो-रो के सजना
देख चुके हम प्यार का सपना) -२
प्रीत है झूटी, प्रीतम झूटा -२
झूटी है सारी नगरिया
मोहे भूल गए...
हम बंजारों की बात मत पूछो जी
जो प्यार किया तो प्यार किया
जो नफरत की तो नफरत की

अच्छा ये तो बात तो फिर आऐंगे
हम तेरे प्यार को आज़माऐंगे

हम दिल नहीं देते हम जान देते हैं
हम दिल नहीं लेते हम जान लेते हैं
ये दुश्मनी है, तुम दोसती ना समझो
दिल की लगी है, तुम दिल्लगी ना समझो
दिल के मारों की बात मत पूछो जी
जो प्यार किया तो प्यार किया
जो नफरत की तो नफरत की

ये तो हैं बंजारे ये तुम कहो प्यारे
प्यार हो जब तड़प के, दिल दिल को पुकारे
सर हाथ पे रख के साथी छुड़ाने आए
सब देखते हों, वो यार को ले जाऐं
सच्चे यारों की बात मत पूछो जी
जो प्यार किया तो प्यार किया
जो नफरत की तो नफरत की

तुम जो कहते हो हम वो करते हैं
हम जो करते हैं, तुम वो कहते हो
कुछ शर्त रख लो
माँगो जवानी दे दें
काफ़ी नहीं ये
ये ज़िंदगानी दे दें
हम दिलदारों की बात मत पूछो जी
जो प्यार किया तो प्यार किया
जो नफरत की तो नफरत की

Wednesday, November 16, 2005

Yaadein
Zindgi mein to tumhari aa na sake, ab khwaabon mein chale aate hain
Tum laakh nazrein pher lo sanam, hum phir bhi chale aate hain

Kahne ko to tum bhul chuki thi, phir bhi anjaane mein pukarti ho
Tum kabhi bhuli nahin thi, sirf jaankar anjaane mein pukarti ho

Mann to mann hai, mann ko kya kahena
Hum aayenge sapno mein, sapno ko kya kahena

Azeez bewafa nahin, tum paas aao ya na aao,
Wo mar ke bhi mara nahin, uski yaadon ko gale se lagao......!!
Yaadein
Zindgi mein to tumhari aa na sake, ab khwaabon mein chale aate hain
Tum laakh nazrein pher lo sanam, hum phir bhi chale aate hain

Kahne ko to tum bhul chuki thi, phir bhi anjaane mein pukarti ho
Tum kabhi bhuli nahin thi, sirf jaankar anjaane mein pukarti ho

Mann to mann hai, mann ko kya kahena
Hum aayenge sapno mein, sapno ko kya kahena

Azeez bewafa nahin, tum paas aao ya na aao,
Wo mar ke bhi mara nahin, uski yaadon ko gale se lagao......!!
Zindagi (Life)
Tufano mein Kashti ko Kinaare bhi milte hai,
Jahan mein Logone ko Sahaare bhi milte hai,
Duniyan mein sabse Pyari hai Zindagi,
kuch log Zindagi se bhi Pyaare milte hai.
Gaur Farmaiye
Yehi Wafaa ka silaah hai, to koi baat nahi
Yeh dard tum ne diya hai, to koi baat nahi
Yehi bohot hai ke tum dekhte ho sahil se
Safeena doob raha hai, to koi baat nahi
Rakha tha aashiyana-e-dil main choopa ke tumko
Woh ghar tumne chod diya hai to koi baat nahi
Tum hi ne aayena-e-dil mera banaya tha
Tum hi ne tod diya hai to koi baat nahi
Kise majaal kahe koi mujh ko deewana
Agar yeh tumne kaha hai to koi baat nahi
Khud Hee Ho Jata Hai..Ishq
Ishq to khud hee ho jaata hai…
Dil bhi apna kho jaata hai…
Jab aisa ho jaata hai…
To dil bekaraar ho jaata hai.

Kyun hota hain humko pyaar…
Mujhko nahi pata yaar.

Itna zaroor pata hai mujhko…
Ek din ye bhi hoga tumko.

Jab hoga tumko pyaar…
Hawa mein udoge tum bhi yaar…
Khush rahoge hardam tum…
Pyaar karoge pyaar se tum.

Aaj tumne jisko dekha hai…
Shayad who hee tumhara apna hai…
Abhi chalega pata nahi…
Intezaar mein rahna har ghadi.
Zindgi mein to tumhari aa na sake, ab khwaabon mein chale aate hain
Tum laakh nazrein pher lo sanam, hum phir bhi chale aate hain

Kahne ko to tum bhul chuki thi, phir bhi anjaane mein pukarti ho
Tum kabhi bhuli nahin thi, sirf jaankar anjaane mein pukarti ho

Mann to mann hai, mann ko kya kahena
Hum aayenge sapno mein, sapno ko kya kahena

Azeez bewafa nahin, tum paas aao ya na aao,
Wo mar ke bhi mara nahin, uski yaadon ko gale se lagao......!!
Control Mind means the Mind
To control the mind means to be the master of the mind. Controlling thoughts is usually understood as clearing out the mind of all negative and waste thoughts when they do arise. So whenever we have negative thoughts we try hard to transform them into the positive ones. Control of the mind is actually to have mastery over my thoughts, so that I am able to direct them as I wish to. So even in the most negative situations I need to maintain my positivity instead of trying hard to convert negative into positive.
Elevated Thoughts
Thoughts are the seeds that create our destiny. Thoughts lead one to destiny. If there is the same thought as before, there is no newness and there cannot be anything new attained. If things have to change, effort needs to be put in at the level of the thought first. Such thoughts will naturally inspire and motivate to make the best use of the available resources. When I begin to create new elevated thoughts in challenging times, I am able to be happy and peaceful. I don't have questions related to the situations but I am able to find the solutions in my mind .This inner peace naturally creates a peaceful environment around me.
Life is a challenge, meet it
Life is a struggle, accept it
Life is a sorrow, overcome it
Life is a mystery, unfold it
Life is a joy, spread it
Life is a duty, perform it
Life is a romance, enjoy it
Life is a gamble, watch it
Life is a tragedy, face it
Life is a song, sing it
Life is a bless, embrace it
Life is a dream, realize it
Life is a journey, complete it
Life is a promise, fulfill it
Life is a puzzle, solve it
Life is an adventure, dare it
Life is an opportunity, grasp it
Life is a game, play it
Life is a God’s gift, cherish it
हम हिन्दोस्तानी
वो जो हिन्दी के प्रसार की बातें करते हैं
बच्चे उनके भी अंग्रेज़ी स्कूलों में पढ़ते हेँ।
स्वयं उन्होंने हिन्दी का
समाचार पत्र तक न पढ़ा होगा
हमारे ढ़ोंग का उदाहरण इससे
और क्या बड़ा होगा?
इतनी बदसलूकी के बाद भी
जन-जन की भाषा इस देश में जिन्दा है।
लेकिन मातृभाषा कहलाये जाने पर
निश्चय ही शर्मिन्दा है।
दासतां का पुट कहलो
या स्वाभिमान की कमी
हम ही सहजनों से कतराते
बदनाम करते हेँ
आन्तरिक प्रशासन की बात हो
या विदेशी मुलाज़्मत
गोरों के नीचे आज भी
हम बेहतर काम करते हैं।
सलाम झाड़ते हैं, 'सर' कह कर बुलाते हैं
सहयोगी तो अक्सर हमें
गंवार नज़र आते हैं।
विदेशियों की सफाई और अच्छाई को तो
हम अपना नहीं सके
ढ़ींगे मारते हम नहीं थकते हैं।
यही कारण है कि इक्कसवीँ शताब्दी में भी
हम सरेआम मूतते और हगते हैं।
प्राकृतिक आपदाओं से भी निपट लेंगे
पहले, आपसी मतभेद सुलझा तो लें
मुख्य मन्त्री ने दी है जो मर्सिडीज़
उसे दो घड़ी चला तो लें।
दो शब्दों में कही जा सकती हे हमारी कहानी
कभी नहीं सुधरेंगे हम हिन्दोस्तानी।
---Hindustani
चाह नहीं मै सुरबाला के
गहनों मे गूंथा जाऊं

चाह नहीं प्रेमी माला में
बिंध प्यारी को ललचाऊं

चाह नहीं सम्राटों के
शव पर हे हरि डाला जाऊं

चाह नहीं देवों के सिर पर
चढूं भाग्य पर इतराऊं

मुझे तोड लेना बनमाली
उस पथ पर तुम देना फेंक

मातृभूमी पर शीश चढाने
जिस पथ जाएं वीर अनेक

---Makhan lal Chaturvedi
तू कहीं भी रहे सर पे तेरे इल्ज़ाम तो है
तेरे हाथों की लकीरों में मेरा नाम तो है

मुझको तू अपना बना या न बना तेरी ख़ुशी
तू ज़माने में मेरे नाम से बदनाम तो है

मेरे हिस्से में कोई जाम न आया न सही
तेरी महफ़िल में मेरे नाम कोई शाम तो है

देख कर लोग मुझे नाम तेरा लेते हैं
इस पे मैं ख़ुश हूं मुहब्बत का ये अंजाम तो है

वो सितमगर ही सही देख के उसको ‘सबीर’
शुक्र इस दिल-ए-बिमार को आराम तो है
राहिले अव्यक्त माझे, प्रेम तुजवरचे, सखे

व्यक्त केल्यावाचुनी का, ना कळे तुजला, सखे.

सांगण्याचे कितितरी मी यत्न केले, पण तरी

राहिले सांगावयाचे कितितरी तुजला, सखे.

दिवस गेले, मास गेले, वर्षे तरी गेली किती

दिसलीच ना माझ्या मनिची, भावना तुजला, सखे.

विश्वास माझा का धरू, वाटे असे सखये तुला

दोष हा माझाच सारा, दोष ना तुजला, सखे.

Tuesday, November 08, 2005

हम क्यों कफन ओढ़ें जो जिंदा साँस हैं,
हम क्यों जहर पीयें कि जब तक आस है,
हौसला बुलंद है जब तक राह में हैं,
दिल में पुखता सा कोई विश्वास है...
"Un jharno, un jheelon, un nadiyon ki yaadein,
Un parwaton pe mandraate ghataon ki yaadein,
Un raaston pe tahalte hue ki gayi wo baatein,
Guzar jaata hai waqt magar rah jaati hain yaadein...

Raat ko sote hue sapnon ke roop mein,
Ya din ko Laptop pe tasveeron ke roop mein,
Kisi se guftagoon karte hue ankhon ke saamne,
Aa jaati hain woh kahin bhi aneko swaroop mein...

Samajh nahi aata ki kaise bhulaoon main,
Sochta rehta hoon ki kya-kya bhool jaoon main,
Mujhe to ab raasta dikhta nahi koi bhi,
Tum hi batao ki kaise is dil ko samjhaoon main...

Beet gayi woh raatein, beet gaye woh din,
Gujarte lamhon mein phir bhi jeetein hai woh din,
Lagta hai jeevan mein kabhi na bhoola paoonga main,
Woh beeti hui raatein, woh beete hue din...">orkut - profile - social: "Un jharno, un jheelon, un nadiyon ki yaadein,
Un parwaton pe mandraate ghataon ki yaadein,
Un raaston pe tahalte hue ki gayi wo baatein,
Guzar jaata hai waqt magar rah jaati hain yaadein...

Raat ko sote hue sapnon ke roop mein,
Ya din ko Laptop pe tasveeron ke roop mein,
Kisi se guftagoon karte hue ankhon ke saamne,
Aa jaati hain woh kahin bhi aneko swaroop mein...

Samajh nahi aata ki kaise bhulaoon main,
Sochta rehta hoon ki kya-kya bhool jaoon main,
Mujhe to ab raasta dikhta nahi koi bhi,
Tum hi batao ki kaise is dil ko samjhaoon main...

Beet gayi woh raatein, beet gaye woh din,
Gujarte lamhon mein phir bhi jeetein hai woh din,
Lagta hai jeevan mein kabhi na bhoola paoonga main,
Woh beeti hui raatein, woh beete hue din..."
Change.....
Change is evident.
Change is inevitable.
Change is neccessary.
Change is acceptance.
Change is relinquishing.
Change is forced.
Change is to combat.
Change is ethereal.
Change sustains.
Change is ordained.
Change is obvious.
Change is effort.
Change is process.
Change demands patience.
Change mandates perseverance.
Change is nice.

Change was latent.

And...Change is due!

N e ways..who else cares but me!

Saturday, November 05, 2005

Ran across this guy. I like his style, and this last story about Uncle Wally is pretty interesting. This is the type of stuff you can't make up. It had to have happend.

Monday, October 31, 2005

Every person has a potential in him but the need is to discover it. Everybody around you has the same potential but what you need is Enthusiasm, Dedication, Honesty, Focussed-Approach and Self-Confidence. These all can come only from you and what you need is to bring them out. Leave the tendency of worrying about the results, just give your best and you would definitely reap very good harvest one day. And your given best will again come to you.

Sunday, October 30, 2005

An old man, going a lone highway,
Came, at the evening, cold and gray,
To a chasm, vast, and deep, and wide,
Through which was flowing a sullen tide.
The old man crossed in the twilight dim;
The sullen stream had no fears for him;
But he turned, when safe on the other side,
And built a bridge to span the tide.
"Old man,"said a fellow pilgrim, near,
"You are wasting strength with building here;
Your journey will end with the ending day;
You never again must pass this way;
You have crossed the chasm, deep and wide -
Why build you the bridge at the eventide?"
The builder lifted his old gray head:
"Good friend, in the path I have come," he said,
"There followeth after me today
A youth, whose feet must pass this way.
This chasm, that has been naught to me,
To that fair-haired youth may a pitfall be.
He, too, must cross in the twilight dim;
Good friend, I am building the bridge for him."
You are that kind of a jewel to me,
who is as precious as the,
diamond which sinked,
when the titanic sanked.

you are that kind of a star,
that always sparkles and,
looks different from others.
you are that star with whom,
i sometimes talk,
when i am sad.

you are that talking picture to me,
with whom i talk,
when i fell awkward to say,
something in front of you.

you are that friend to me,
to the destiny has forgot to give me as,
A SISTER.

you are like a beautiful rainbow to me,
who makes me smile,
when i've been through a storm.


you are not less than,
a comic character,
whom i love a lot and,
who makes me fell happy and laugh.

you are the one who makes me feel that,
i am someone and,
i have cetain duties to carry on.

you are like an inspiration to me,
when i've lost all hopes,
and you bring out a world inside of me,
that i never knew i had.

you are the one friend,
for whom i would,
like to take millions of births,
to thank you,
for what you have done for me-----from the begining to the end.

you are the friend,
infront of whom,
i never make excuses,
and never tells lies.
because you know me,
better than anyone would ever had.
you know me by my faults and demerits,
rather than my,
few good points.

you are a friend,
who is always close to me,
on whom i can always count on,
who multiplies my JOYS and SORROWS,
by a smile and a laugh.

you are a friend,
who knows what i am thinking.
What my likes and dislike are,
what i wished to be,
and that always think good of me.

you are like a candle,
who's flame glows brighter,
at the time of darkness.

you are a friend,
with whom i celebrate,
the happiness you give to me,
with whom i would like to make,
everyday of my life-----A HOLIDAY,
and want to celebrate it as never before.

you are a friend,
who always forgives me,
even though when i am wrong.

you are friend,
who is always there,
and,
will be always there,
in my life, no matter what.
and not like the waves upon the sand,
day and night.

YOU and I are something else,
like the permanent things,
there fatty me,
or my smeely socks,
which never goes away.

you are a friend,
who will accompany me,
to the end,
no matter what!

you are a friend,
to whom i would like,
to give one gift,
THE ABILITY TO SEE YOURSELF,
as the others do.
because except this,
i don't have he ther precious gift for you.

you are a friend,
to whom,
i hate to say GOOD BYE,
because i need you and,
want you to be always,
near and closer to me.

each day spent with you is better than the last.
and my first day spent with you was the best day of my life.


you are the friend,
who thinks i am a good egg,
even though you know,
i am slightly cracked.

you are a friend,
who has given me everything.
from a good advice,
to a pep talk,
when i was sad.

you are the reason,
for my smile.
you are the reason,
for my sucess.
you are the reason,
for my good behavior with others.
you are the reason,
for everything good in me.

you are a friend,
i sometimes share a silence,
yet feel so comfortable.

you are a friend,
who never let me realized,
that i am not in a level with you,
that i don't deserve you,
that i am not as good and as great as you are,
and that,
as beautiful and as nice by heart as you.

you never looked down upon me but ,
always encouraged me.

to have a friend like you,
TINNY,
is my highest delight of my life.

you are a friend,
that provides me with strength,
when i need the most.

i value you more than i value my life.
so, when i say, YOU ARE MY FRIEND, it's just means,
YOU ARE MY LIFE.

Now we are a kind of friends,
who have shared,
so much laughter,
so many tears.
i know,
we are not sister by birth,
but sisters,
whom destiny has forgot to give us,
and there's something,
that puts us together by hearts.

I THANK YOU for all the,
kindness, honesty, warmth and goodness,
you have shown to me.
And in return,
i have the,
BLOOD OF MY BODY,
ALL FOR YOU.

"A friend is someone who gives you total freedom to be yourself." -Jim Morrison

The person had jaggedy brown hair cut close to its face and wore one of those undershirtlike tops with faded jeans cut off above the knees. He couldn't honestly tell whether it was a girl or a boy.
"Hi," he or she said, jerking his or her head toward the Perkins place. "We just moved in."

Jess stood where he was, staring.

The person slid off the fence and came toward him. "I thought we might as well be friends," it said. "There's no one else close by."

Girl, he decided. Definitely girl, but he couldn't have said why he was suddenly sure.

Monday, October 24, 2005


This is for you, my best friend,
the one person i can tell my soul too
Who can relate to me like no other
Who I can laugh with to no extents,
Who I can cry too when times are tough,
Who can help me with the problems of my life.

Never have you turned your back on me
Or told me I wasnt good enough
Or let me down

I don't think you know what that means to me
You have went through so much pain and you still have time
For me.
And I love you for listening even when inside YOU are dying
And I look up too you because you are strong,
and caring
and beautiful.
Even though you don't think you are.

And I hope you know that I am always here
To listen to you laugh and cry and help
In all the ways that i can
And I will try to be at least half the friend you are
To me.

I hope you know I would not be the person I am today, with out you.
My best friend

Wednesday, October 19, 2005


Knowledge should never be bound by the limits of a singular domain. it should percolate into the multiple hues of life & spread ever many a sphere but mer knowledge may not suffice unless it exhibits the character of versatility and flexibility to transform itself but when it obeys it forms the basis of a structure that grows with the sky as its limit.

Friday, October 14, 2005

Hello Dears


Good fiction has never been about moral instruction; it would be much easier to write if it were. Its more imposing task is to do justice to the inexhaustible complexity of human motivation. Because our motives are often hidden from us, because the canvas of even our own experience can be too much for our eye to take in, we look to writers to help make comprehensible the reasons why people act the way they act, why they transgress, why they fail to transgress. In this respect the fictional outlaw has at least as much to teach us as the upright citizen—a principle older than Céline or Shakespeare or Milton, perhaps as old as storytelling itself.

One of contemporary fiction’s most frustrating tropes, however, holds that even the most shocking transgression is made psychologically credible when a character carries it out not for exotic or obscure reasons but for no reason whatsoever. The technique itself is less startling than its rate of critical success, for the credibility of such inventions depends on accepting the proposition that they are not inventions at all but something more profound, more authentic, than mere art.

An exemplary case is that of Neil LaBute, the widely praised filmmaker (In the Company of Men, Your Friends & Neighbors) and playwright (Fat Pig), who has now brought his troupe of hideous men into the realm of the short story with a debut collection entitled Seconds of Pleasure. The narrator of “Perfect,” the lead story in the book, has a wife, and that wife has an unsightly mole on her shoulder, and her husband fantasizes about pinning her to the ground and digging the mole out of her flesh with a potato peeler; but before he can tell us about all that, there is something important that he needs to establish:

I am not perfect. Not even close. In fact, I’m barely average, if anything. I’m just this extremely basic guy who goes pretty much unnoticed most of the time. . . . I’m valuable at work, dependable and pleasant, and a man who is generally seen as “going places.”
It’s a less than subtle setup for the shocks that follow, but it’s something more than that as well, for he’s far from the only character in Seconds of Pleasure to wave so insistently the flag of his own ordinariness; the narrator of “Los Feliz,” to cite another example, describes himself by telling us—not once, but three times—that he has “the wife and the 2.7 kids.” Nor do we have to take the characters’ own words for it, for LaBute avails himself of a number of techniques to reinforce the message that his creations are Everymen, representatives of a kind of cultural baseline. None of the narrators, for instance, has a name, and only a few of the stories are given specific geographic settings (usually in Hollywood). Which is not to suggest that LaBute has anything against proper nouns per se: indeed, the book’s strongest attempt at sensory detail is to refer to objects by their brand names. “He hangs up,” goes a representative sentence, “and slips the Motorola deep into his bathrobe pocket for safekeeping as he starts to peel off his Jockeys.”

Relying on words such as “Lexus” and “Dockers” and “Bulova” to do the work of visual description and, to a great extent, characterization is not a tactic invented by LaBute, of course; it’s become a commonplace of contemporary fiction since the appearance of the Ur-text of this practice, Bret Easton Ellis’s laboriously shocking American Psycho. The image in which such work traffics is ready-made and mass-produced, one that readers collectively see in exactly the same way, one that is entirely dependent upon their having seen it somewhere else before. This off-the-rack approach to creation is sometimes munificently presumed to constitute a “comment” on the character’s mindset or on the society that generates it, even when the absence of the writer’s own critical faculties makes it seem less a comment than a symptom. Still, to call it laziness and leave it at that is to miss this technique’s real import. The fiction writer’s classical tactic has been to try to make imaginary people seem real by taking pains to render them as distinctly, as uniquely, as possible. But to define one’s characters, or to suggest that they define themselves, via mass-produced cultural referents is to imagine individuals as, ultimately, members of a crowd, and to suggest that what animates them is not their uniqueness but their commonality.

Commonality with whom, though? LaBute, for one, seems less than honest about this. Although most of the stories in Seconds of Pleasure appear at first to be two-character pieces, before long you begin to notice the recurring presence of a third figure on the page, one whose attention seems to be more important to the narrator than that of the second character: you. In story after story, the reader is rhetorically addressed by the narrator: “Pitiful, you say? Insipid and facile, not to mention shallow? I agree.” Or: “You know how many times I’ve tried to make that woman laugh? Do you?!” There’s something oddly literal about all this apostrophizing. LaBute’s narrators speak like people who know they are being watched by someone they cannot see or hear. They confront us instead of our inhabiting them. We are their judges—and as such we take note of their statements in their own defense but do not feel compelled to respond. The message these characters are sending, in harping on their own un-extraordinariness, is not how much they have in common with the reader, or even with the writer, but how much they have in common with each other. The real alliance forged by all those paranoid invocations of “you” is not between reader and character but between reader and author. In LaBute’s work the process of creation is a voyeuristic rather than an empathetic one. The approach to character is always from the outside in.

This runs counter to LaBute’s own public pronouncements about his work, in which he suggests that the vindictive, selfish, violent, supremely angry men who are the protagonists are, in fact, him. It’s always been a disingenuous stance, though, and it’s on the page—where he can’t rely on the help of actors to contribute at least a behavioral show of empathy—that his fundamental condescension to his characters is revealed. It would be a mistake to ascribe this condescension to inexperience, for LaBute has made his estimable career in films and on stage precisely by cultivating this idea of men’s inescapable essence, by insisting that his creations are not really creations at all but bravely unbowdlerized portraits of, as the title of one of his movies has it, “Your Friends & Neighbors.” The psychological source of their most vicious thoughts and actions, he insists, is to be sought not in the characters themselves, or even in their creator, but in a self-fulfilling postulate about how men “really” are. It’s a savvy way to frame your own work, because it has the effect of preempting criticism: if you dislike LaBute’s art—at least if you’re a man—presumably it’s not because you actually dislike it but because you can’t take it. If his art is a mirror, then rejecting the art itself risks seeming like a kind of denial, an unwillingness to confront your true nature.

* * *

Women, too, have a true nature in LaBute’s art. They come in three guises: attractive and stupid (good for sex), unattractive and stupid (still good for sex), and hostile, shrewish, and smart (wives). The willingness to flirt with blatant misogyny is sometimes cited as the most daring element of LaBute’s work, perhaps because it’s the aspect that opens him up most easily to condemnation. But it’s hard to get roiled up by a vision of battle-ax wives and licentious single babes that’s about as edgy as a Playboy cartoon. What’s off-putting about it has nothing to do with gender stereotypes at all: it’s the sense of manufactured confrontation, the artistic bad faith involved in positing a universe so full of hostility that all an author has to do to motivate an argument—or a betrayal, or a fight, or a rape, or a murder—is to take a couple of characters at random and turn them to face each other. As a dramatist, LaBute could hardly set the bar for conflict any lower than he does. If all wives are harridans, and all men are pathologically angry, then the author barely has to do anything to engineer an attack such as this one: “I’m not turning around because you sicken me. That’s why. You piss me off and treat me so badly that I’ve just about had all that I can take. Okay? This is a declaration of war, I guess, because I have had my fill.”

The women do sometimes strike back, in their way. The betrayed wife in “Loose Change” throws herself “like a rabid dog . . . again and again” against the driver’s-side window of her husband’s car. In “Maraschino,” a young woman sleeps with her father, who, having left her mother when she was a child, doesn’t recognize her now; her motivation for doing so (“It’s funny, lying there, letting him fuck me like that”) is nonexistent, which is to say that it’s a Mystery, one for the reader to speculate.

Meanwhile, the men insist that they themselves are not mysterious at all. And although they might be prone to the occasional spontaneous combustion—physical assault, sexual revenge, verbal cruelty of every sort—what’s really intended to provoke us is not what they feel but everything they don’t feel. That free-floating, ever present masculine anger enables LaBute’s men to commit a staggering range of heinous acts with no apparent motivation or remorse. The acts themselves are dispassionate; what is intended to be shocking in each case is not the cruelty itself so much as the lack of affect and reflection that surrounds both the deed and its aftermath. In the story titled “Ravishing,” for instance, two friends make a snuff film: “Standing there, looking at each other afterward, we start to smile at a job well done—light from the camera humming away; it doesn’t know the difference between this and a Little League game.”

And it’s here, finally, that we see the real upside for LaBute of the voyeuristic approach to character: it allows him to pretend that his own job is as easy, as devoid of responsibility, as the camera’s. It’s a way of ducking what a more sophisticated writer might consider his primary artistic responsibility: namely, a credible motivation for his imaginary characters to say and do the things they say and do. LaBute tries to wriggle out of this job by insisting it was never his job to begin with; if we accept the somewhat counterintuitive assertion that his characters spring not from him but from a condescendingly defined maleness, that he is not inventing them but exposing them, then nothing about their individual situations needs to be explained to us, none of them really needs a reason in order to act, in which case even the most extreme action is justified. And if that extreme, violent, pathological behavior is negatively defined—that is, as a matter not of feeling something extraordinary but of feeling nothing at all—then that makes an understanding of your characters’ motives even easier to simulate. You just feel nothing, too.

But to claim significance for a vacuum is easy; in the rueful words of Flannery O’Connor, something has to be in a story in the first place before it can then be artfully left out. When it comes to the moral dimension of a work of narrative art—human beings choosing, whether nobly or foolishly, from a range of potential actions and in the face of some sort of internal or external opposition—one writer’s vacuum is really the same as another’s. Imaginary people doing things for no reason at all: it’s a default position some artists try to legitimate by insisting that the empty space at the center of their work is not something they are actively creating but something they are courageously exposing. This is the essential con in Neil LaBute’s art, and he isn’t the only contemporary writer who’s figured out how to work it.

* * *

The novel, writes Milan Kundera in his essay collection Testaments Betrayed, is “a realm where moral judgment is suspended. . . . From the viewpoint of the novel’s wisdom, that fervid readiness to judge is the most detestable stupidity, the most pernicious evil. Not that the novelist utterly denies that moral judgment is legitimate, but that he refuses it a place in the novel. If you like, you can accuse Panurge of cowardice, accuse Emma Bovary, accuse Rastignac—that’s your business; the novelist has nothing to do with it.”

A subtle idea, one that at first pass doesn’t sound too far removed from the studied amorality of a LaBute story. There’s a difference, however, and it has nothing in the least to do with the notion of fiction as a moral parable, or with a belief that good should triumph over evil or vice versa. The difference lies with Kundera’s concept of the suspension of judgment, which is not a mere matter of authorial inactivity. Since a reader’s final judgment of a character represents the terminal point of that character’s development, the writer is well advised to delay the reader’s ability—indeed, the reader’s human instinct, as Kundera calls it—to arrive at that point. The method for frustrating that inclination is not simply to ignore everything associated with morality altogether but actively to complicate it, to provide multiple judgments, multiple moral viewpoints, within the work of fiction itself. Moral judgment is not ignored or banished or declared moot but suspended, in the way that, say, a bridge is suspended: via tension between opposites, a tension that, at least for the term of the story itself, holds at bay our impatience to make up our minds.

Books that generate that sense of opposition internally, by credibly advancing more than one idea, are working at the highest level. Books that depend for their sense of opposition on the straw man of a presupposed bourgeois mentality outside the fiction itself—on shock value, in other words—are working in conditions of profound safety disguised as risk. The characters suffer no repercussions (nor do the writers, for that matter, regardless of outlaw posturing), but the atmosphere is one of self-conscious edginess and aesthetic daring.

A. M. Homes’s novel Music for Torching opens on a young couple named Paul and Elaine, who live in the suburbs north of Manhattan. Dissatisfied with their empty, wretched existence, they try—spontaneously and, as it turns out, unsuccessfully—to burn their own house down. This act symbolizes their desperation to break free from the relentless pressures of suburban conformity. The sinister, violent heart that beats beneath the repressively pristine exterior of life in the suburbs: surely it behooves a writer to at least question such received ideas rather than found one’s work on them. In this case, though, the soul-crushing imperative to behave normally is embodied nowhere inside the novel itself; on the contrary, the daily life of this particular suburb—cross-dressing, child endangerment, genital tattooing—amounts to a virtual orgy of rebellion, but against what? The specter of Stepfordesque repression is a kind of prefabricated mentality that Homes occasionally invokes (“Nothing matters to me more than being normal,” says one neighborhood housewife, shortly before violating Elaine with a strap-on dildo named Buster) but that the reader is expected to have previously internalized. Within the novel there is no resistance to self-expression whatsoever—indeed, to the extent that the characters do display a tendency toward conformity, it’s in their relentless refusal to conform, their compulsion to let their freak flags fly. No one is ever troubled or surprised or inconvenienced by anything anyone else does; one running joke involves an obscene phone caller to whom everyone in town, right down to the stock boy at the local supermarket, reacts with the same comic indifference. Rather than give credible life to opposing ideas, Homes’s characters are all in service to the same idea; our own presumed beliefs about bourgeois normality are supposed to provide the resistance that renders their behavior transgressive in the first place.

Will Self’s characters are conceived as examples (though admittedly extreme ones) of certain societal types, from crack addicts to self-absorbed yuppies. The stories in Tough, Tough Toys for Tough, Tough Boys depend heavily upon a sense of otherness and contempt; their remote tone, as well as their frequent forays into the fantastic, give them the quality of moral fables. They are saved by their own taste for low comedy, which keeps things from getting too sanctimonious—and Self never attempts to legitimate his own outré taste in incident by insisting, as LaBute does, that he’s not enjoying himself but rather doing his reluctant duty. Still, creating characters that are easily mocked and then mocking them does not carry an exceptionally high degree of difficulty. In nearly every story, a solipsistic prig receives the comeuppance he deserves, and what is supposed to differentiate this comeuppance from the shooting of fish in a barrel is that the prigs are not inventions but social indictments, diagnoses of the world outside the fiction itself. When, in “The Nonce Prize,” two London crack addicts named Gerald and Shaun “manage to achieve very considerable objectivity about their favourite shared fantasy—the abduction, buggering, torture, mutilation, and eventual murder of a young boy, the younger the better,” Self’s detached, condescending tone is meant not to frustrate judgment but to encourage it. No effort is made to render these characters or their desires. Their amorality is not developed from the inside in a way that might make it credible or even frighteningly comprehensible. The book is a trip to the moral zoo.

One obvious technical maneuver that contributes to the air of smug diagnosis in Self’s work (and to a lesser extent in Homes’s) is the use of a particularly remote third-person narrator. Conversely, one way an author might try to close the clinical gap between himself and his characters is to write in the first person, making it necessary, to some extent, to assume that character, to inhabit him or her, to generate a sense of complicity that is passed on to the reader as well. James M. Cain’s The Postman Always Rings Twice is a classic example of a novel that uses the “I” to produce its own completely organic outlaw morality. Cain’s narrator, Frank Chambers, meets a woman on page 1, and by page 14 he is plotting to murder her husband—not because he feels nothing but because he feels so overwhelmingly.

The first-person narrator of Chuck Palahniuk’s novel Survivor, by contrast, succumbs to the trope of numbness, to the belief that an undefined existential boredom is sufficient motivation for even the most extreme behavior. We first encounter him putting up signs at pay phones urging the deeply depressed to call his own home phone number, as if it were a suicide hot line; when they do, he advises them to go ahead and commit suicide. There’s a cheap, high school nihilism behind the whole conceit, but what’s even more depressingly familiar is the narrator’s insistence that he’s been pushed to such extremes by his own unfeeling and causeless anomie. Eventually, he hijacks a plane with the intention of committing suicide:

You’ll have air-conditioning and stereo music, [the pilot] says, for as long as you can feel anything.
The last time I felt anything, I tell him, was a ways back.
Dennis Cooper’s novel Frisk also features a narrator who can’t feel anything, except when viewing snuff pornography or, ultimately, acting it out himself. Here, too, the Emptiness of Modern Life is presumed to take the place of character development, and even the most egregious acts of violence are carried out not for some terrible or exotic reason but, much more simply, for no reason at all. In this case the first-person voice becomes a boon, for the narrator’s lack of self-knowledge can trump any sense of responsibility on the author’s part to understand things better himself: “I was about to come. I picked up an empty beer bottle without even thinking and hit the guy over the head. I don’t know why . . . Then I crawled across the room and sat cross-legged, watching him bleed to death. I stayed there all night, worn out, vaguely wondering why I didn’t go phone the police, or feel guilt or sympathy for his friends.”

Small wonder most of these books have a hard time ending. “Incident,” E. M. Forster once advised novelists, “springs out of character; and having occurred, it alters that character.” But characters who experience no resistance and who act for no reason cannot be altered by events; they don’t develop, they just intensify. Music for Torching ends with the gratuitous death of a child at the hands of a playmate in a Columbine-like school shooting. Frisk devolves into an orgy of rape, torture, and disembowelment that strains mightily to be shocking. Survivor’s narrator hijacks a plane, kicks the pilot off, and waits for the inevitable to happen once the fuel runs out. All of them conclude in the way a fireworks show concludes, with an amped-up display of the same thing they’ve been doing all along.

* * *

Many—in fact, most—of the stories in Seconds of Pleasure are narrated in the first person as well; but LaBute has ways of undermining the potential intimacy of this technique and of imposing a safe, clinical distance between himself and the character with whom he purports to claim solidarity. In discussing his wife’s offending mole, the narrator of “Perfect” has a sudden memory “of freshman English back at Pepperdine, where some teaching assistant forced us to read that Nathaniel Hawthorne guy. A short story of his that had to do with some flaw in an otherwise lovely woman, but I can’t remember any of the specifics about it for the life of me.” Understandable, perhaps, that one would remember only dimly something read in freshman English. But that’s just the first time this kind of thing happens:

They remind him of those girls from that John Updike story, the one about the guy in the supermarket. It’s really great, although the title of it doesn’t come easily to mind.

—“Boo-Boo”

Kind of like that one picture of the dude clutching the sides of his head and crying out—you know the one I’m talking about? It’s famous, I think.

—“Grand Slam”

He was nibbling on the cherry—I forget the name of those, what is it?—you know, the one from his glass.

—“Maraschino”

A flash goes off in his head, a snapshot of a film that he saw years ago, in college maybe, of a man obsessed with a young woman’s leg. Her knee or something. One of those French or Italian kinds, where not much happens and the words are carefully printed all along the bottom of the screen.

—“Boo-Boo”

What was it that comedian used to say, that fellow with all the—he’d come onstage and do the wife jokes. Remember? “Take my wife. Please.”

—“Some Do It Naturally”

What are we to make of this motif of cultural ignorance, applied across so many different stories and characters? It’s an instructive bit of bad faith, because while pretending allegiance with his characters, LaBute is actually conducting a conversation with the reader over those characters’ heads. The narrators may be too dumb to know that that picture of the guy “crying out” is called “The Scream,” but you and LaBute certainly aren’t, and so he provides these little interludes during which author and reader can exchange a knowing, indulgent wink before you both turn your attention back to the poor slob at the center of the story.

It’s a device that lays bare LaBute’s contempt for the men with whom he declares solidarity. “I think if women actually had a sense of what we are,” he once told an interviewer, “they would run screaming.” Yet that “we” is itself a lie: his male characters are not surrogates for his own sensibility but sacrifices to it. Artist, diagnose thyself.

Friday, September 23, 2005

As darkness drifts into yet another sky, and the painted sunset disappears from my eye, I wonder the reasons and contemplate your plan, for making me such a poor and pitiful old man. The greatness that I dreamt of, in my much younger years, gets lost with the sun as it hides from these tears. My reason for existence is pure fiction at its best, yet greatness in my thoughts that make me feel blessed. Reality hiding away like the sun in the sky, and with the morrow I might understand why, that my life revolves around the fiction from me, instead of the truth that most people see.

Sunday, September 18, 2005

Dear Friend,

With all that happens in life on any given day, we oftentimes forget what is most important to us all. With that in mind, I wanted to take a moment to dash off this short note to you.

Your friendship has been a key element of my life all of these years. I simply would not have been able to enjoy the good times in life as much as I have if you had not been around. And, of course, I do not think it possible for me to easily have survived the difficulties life dishes out from time to time had you not been at my side.

Too often friends are taken for granted. But, I suppose that it is not unlike the manner in which people take the air that we breathe for granted as well. But, in the end, it begs the question to ask where we would be without the air that we breathe.

Here's to you and to many more years of our invaluable friendship.

Your friend,

Vipul Chaudhari